![lightzone vs lightroom 2015 lightzone vs lightroom 2015](https://i0.wp.com/cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/CPRRNXrFFMus84KyDLm6DV.jpg)
I haven't had any problems but conversion with ufraw solves that if concerned. I did ask him about camera ICC files once - he has strong opinions on what camera makers should do. No noticeable delay on a 2.6ghz core 2 duo even as the contrast curve or amount slider is being used.Ĭopy paste on images works in much the same was as PS. The degree can be changed and it always briefly reverts back to the original before applying the new setting. Sharpening has a slight delay which turns out to be useful. The only delay I notice if I blur a 16mp image. Curious who has tried Fotoxx?Īll of the whole image type changes can also be applied with the mouse or to selections. I know there are several Linux users on here. Honesty.Īnyway, as far as I'm concerned, it's fun tinkering around with Lightzone, Dark Table, Photivo, GIMP ( oh, glad to say, GIMP has tons of supporters/tutorials, it has its own forum too.), Lightroom, Helicon Filter, etc. Couldn't care less.Īs I replied to Christina's question what we learned from photography, I'll say it again.ģ. Hey, if they don't want to use open source, no prob.
LIGHTZONE VS LIGHTROOM 2015 SOFTWARE
Less convenient, but it works for me.I don't think we open source/free software users should defend our choice. I use one program for raw development and basic editing, another for pixel level editing (with layers and masks), and a third for panorama stitching and such. One thing to note here: if you use other programs, you might need several programs to get all the functionalities you want, that photoshop offers in one package. I'm not convinced that there are things you can do in photoshop and not with another program. But that's a choice each has to make for himself. Is that price justified for every amateur? Not all of them spend several thousands of € on equipment, so do they need the top editing program? Of course, using something else can be more time consuming, or less easy to use. If both are the same, fine, but that's a discussion that we've had here already (iirc, ). On the other hand, photoshop has a price, whether through the cloud or through 'traditional' pricing. I agree, there's a lot more information available for photoshop c.s. I didn't mean to say that we poor Linux users are abandoned, just please note that there is a group of users that cannot use photoshop, thus has to use something else. PS is an entirely different type of package. All I have done is watch a few tutorials.
LIGHTZONE VS LIGHTROOM 2015 TRIAL
I hope to download a trial and see if it runs under wine. Lightroom probably will too but I have a feeling that it's a little dedicated to certain operations.
![lightzone vs lightroom 2015 lightzone vs lightroom 2015](https://i1.wp.com/cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/jpFqQKBLY3jQe4ZJDfiiRV.jpg)
Many new comers wont have even used curves and I do feel that some of the OS stuff mentioned would help them on their way. Mostly on shots out of a compact as my kit wasn't really suitable for the sort of carrying around I need. Up to a couple of years ago the only adjustments I used were curves and sharpening. Not that I have any interest in selling.Īll in all there is a lot to learn. People do buy these things and stick them on the wall. Still working on it and with some subjects probably wont be a popular way of going about things. Personally I try to follow a painters view of that. There is also the business of framing the actual shot. I still maintain that providing some one can use a package making best use of the facilities effectively to improve results is a separate problem and takes some time to pick up. The tutorials that interest me and I see most often are pp technique ones. I see that Manfred and 25 quid a month isn't too bad really for some one to spend on one of their serious hobbies.